Ladislav Bittman / Czech defector - AI article produced

 Ladislav Bittman was a former Czechoslovak intelligence officer who specialized in disinformation and propaganda. He was the architect of a notorious operation known as Operation Neptune, which aimed to smear public figures in West Germany by planting forged Nazi documents in a lake in Czechoslovakia and then “discovering” them¹. One of the targets of this operation was Franz Josef Strauss, the leader of the Christian Social Union and a candidate for chancellor in 1965².

Bittman also claimed that he was involved in another operation to spread false information about the role of the CIA in the 1964 coup in Brazil. He said that he forged documents that suggested that the CIA had supported and financed the overthrow of President João Goulart, and that he distributed them to Brazilian journalists who were on the payroll of the Czechoslovak intelligence service³. He said that this operation was part of a larger campaign to undermine the credibility and influence of the United States in Latin America³.

Bittman defected to the United States in 1968, after the Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia. He changed his name to Lawrence Martin-Bittman and became a professor of disinformation at Boston University. He wrote several books and articles exposing the Soviet and Czechoslovak disinformation tactics and warning about their dangers to democracy¹. He died in 2018 at the age of 87¹.

If you want to learn more about Bittman and his operations, you can check out the following sources:

• Cold War Disinformation: New Revelations about Operation NEPTUNE from Czech Archives: This is a blog post by Calder Walton, who interviewed Bittman shortly before his death and accessed the Czech archives that reveal the details of Operation Neptune.
• Lawrence Martin-Bittman - Wikipedia: This is a Wikipedia article that provides a biography of Bittman and his career as an intelligence officer and a defector.
• Ladislav Bittman – Wikipédia, a enciclopédia livre: This is a Wikipedia article in Portuguese that mentions Bittman’s role in spreading disinformation about the CIA’s involvement in the 1964 coup in Brazil.

Artificial Intelligence article on Anatolyi Golytsin " New Lies for Old" Book

 Anatolyi Golytsin was a former KGB officer who defected to the West in 1961. He wrote a book called New Lies for Old in 1984, in which he exposed the Soviet strategy of deception and disinformation against the Western world¹. He claimed that the Soviet Union was planning a long-term scheme of pretending to reform and liberalize, while secretly preparing for a surprise attack and world domination². He predicted some of the events that happened in the late 1980s and early 1990s, such as the collapse of the Berlin Wall, the end of the Cold War, and the rise of Gorbachev¹.

Golytsin’s book was controversial and met with skepticism by many Western analysts and officials. Some of his critics accused him of being paranoid, delusional, or a disinformation agent himself¹. However, some of his supporters, such as former CIA counterintelligence chief James Angleton, praised him for his courage, insight, and accuracy³. Angleton wrote a review of Golytsin’s book, in which he endorsed his analysis and warned about the dangers of Soviet deception³.

Golytsin’s book is still relevant today, as it provides a historical perspective on the Soviet tactics and goals, and raises questions about the current state of Russia and its relations with the West. You can read more about Golytsin and his book from the following sources:

• New Lies For Old: The Communist Strategy of Deception and Disinformation: This is the full text of Golytsin’s book, available online for free.
• New Lies for Old: The Communist Strategy of Deception and Disinformation: This is a Google Books preview of Golytsin’s book, with some additional information and reviews.
• New lies for old : the Communist strategy of deception and disinformation: This is another online version of Golytsin’s book, with a different format and cover.
• Anatoliy Golitsyn’s first book, ‘New Lies for Old’, caused a running sensation when it was discovered that, unlike most Western analysts, the Author had accurately predicted some years ahead of the events, the ‘Break with the Past’ which took place in Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union in 1989-91: This is a PDF file of a book by Christopher Story, called The Perestroika Deception, which builds on Golytsin’s analysis and provides more evidence and arguments for his thesis.
• Anatoliy Golitsyn - Wikipedia: This is a Wikipedia article about Golytsin’s life, career, and views.
• DOC IS REVIEW BY JAMES ANGLETON OF ‘NEW LIES FOR OLD’ BY ANATOLI GOLITSYN: This is a CIA document that contains Angleton’s review of Golytsin’s book, along with some comments and notes.

Rocks

Defending the Republic

 

The site from Sidney Powell was blocked on Twitter....

https://www.defendingtherepublic.org/

The truth about yellow vest movement in France

I friend of mine, Erik Svane, from the blog "No Pasarán" has wrote an article about the truth of the yellow vest movement in France.

Here´s the text.

Jair Bolsonaro, Brazil's president elect, by his own words.

International lies about Jair Bolsonaro

The Truth About Jair Bolsonaro, the "populist" brazilian candidate.

It has been a long time since I posted the last time.
My life changed a lot, since I moved to Portugal, but I have never stopped to analyze the Brazil´s situation, but my comments are mostly made on facebook.
Overwhelmed on the wrong comments about the candidate Jair Bolsonaro (for Brazil elections) I have reading on portuguese and even foreign press, I decided to return to blogging.

1) Jair Bolsonaro is populist or extreme-right candidate: Wrong. In Brazil all majoritary parties are all from left, it is so massive that in 2006 elections Lula da Silva complimented that that year election would not have any "right party" running for president. Yes. 
The Brazilian political landscape was very left centered (until this election). The perception from the people perspective was that "PSDB" (brazilian social democracy party) was "right" and "PT" (worker´s party) was left. But in fact is only a  battle inside the same political block.
Since the democracy returned in the 80´s all the major parties become leftist more and more, until the "right" disapperared from the elections in 2006.
But every ups  predicts its downs, from the deep down emerged some angry and revolt against the corruption and recession.
The manifestations against PT, the Dilma´s impeachment was a clear sign that the public was fed up about it.
At the other hand, the results from the operation "lava jato" (Car wash operation) made clear that the corruption was not coming from PT but it spilled into all major parties, including the intented "rightwing" party, PSDB.
From this perspective, emerged Jair Bolsonaro, the only politician that was not involved in any corruption scheme, a visceral (sometimes too visceral) defender of justice and family.
Jair Bolsonaro is tha a truly centered rightwing candidate. Not an "extremist". Don´t trust what you hear about it.
2) Jair Bolsonaro is new Hitler: Everytime a real opposition appeared it was always called "fascist" by the left, cause "fascist" is whatever and whoever  the left wants it to be.
Jair Bolsonaro is very visceral in defense of what he cares the most: family values and fight the criminals, not matter what. All the comments on he as being "mysogynist", "racist", "homophobic" are just because he is against the feminism, race quotas and the gaysism agenda being pushed to the the kids. That´s all. About women, he is the only one in the parliament that defended the "chemical castration" to rapist. Of course all the Hitler comments came from his support laws in favour of the legal right to own and carry guns, in a way to ease brazilians from the burden of nearly 60.000 deaths a year caused by criminals.
3) Jair Bolsonaro is the new Trump: Maybe this is correct only in the way the public perceived his candidacy not the origin and not the way his campaign is being ran. Trump is a billionarie that could  spend millions into his campaign. Bolsonaro almost hasn´t own resources, so his campaign was done by the internet. He become a popular "meme" for his outlandish and boldly remarks against his opposition in parliament and even the press. Here is some similarity, cause  Trump and Bolsonaro were mocked as a "joke" by the official press. The other difference is that Trump reignited an almost dead party, but Bolsonaro had to create his own party, cause no one major party accepted his candidacy. The main differences are: While Trump started as an economic libertarian and social liberal and became more nationalist and conservative, Bolsonaro started as nationalist and conservative, now he is more libertarian in terms of economy but conservative the same.

Hope he is going to win the 28th October elections!

¡No Pasarán!: Good-Bye, Friend: Hallelujah, Leonard Cohen

¡No Pasarán!: Good-Bye, Friend: Hallelujah, Leonard Cohen: Leonard Cohen — Hallelujah

Brazil: Protest Erupts as President Dilma appointed Lula to the Ministry

Today, after President Dilma appointed Lula da Silva to her ministry - to allow him escape from prosecution on corruption investigation - thousands of Brazilians flooded the streets to protest against it.

Below, a photo taken today at Sao Paulo.

The Achemical Gay Wedding of Christian Rosenkreutz

Conservatives, you must understand one thing for once and for all: You are not fighting against "political ideals" or even "rights" from the regular political view point. No.
You are trying to find a set of ideals that resemble "IV Reich" and, just like the latter, have its roots profoundly interlaced in occultism, alchemy and theosophy.

The goal of this "marriage" is not the "happiness" of anyone, but the destruction of the very concept of  marriage between man and woman as God has defined it.

You are not debating with people. They are avatars of something with a different stuff. They are puppets of the New Order and they are very passionate of their beliefs. They believe in "science" but cannot react to any rational argument. They are opposed to the very idea that women (or men) can marry a man (or woman) to be happy, instead, they advocate that no woman need to be married to be happy. No woman need to be mother to be happy.
But gays, they MUST marry to be happy!

No, you can´t catch up with this. No rational arguments will stop them from trying to destruct everything that was put in place (as a result of centuries long hard work) to bring up a society based on justice, self-determination, freedom and God.

They think they are "rational" but their talking points are no more than idea implants given by the leaders.

The gay movement is the one good example: instead of trying to help their "brothers" assassinated on Iran, Russia, or by ISIS, they turn their heads from them and focus on the joy of "wedding". They don´t try to test it on Iran, Russia, because what is in stake is not the homosexual "rigth", but the ability to use them as a weapon against the judeo-christian heritage.

The "wedding" / "marriage" is, in fact, of the alchemical origin  and was designed to a sign of the transformation of the man to god, asserting the ability of tuning wishes into reality , not matter if it is against physics or biology. Or logic.

 

The Dream Is Over.. Enter the Nightmare...

​I have to talk about the "20 cents revolution" in my country.

You know that for most of the last 10 years, I have been a critic of Brazil´s government.

Many people have been questioning me about the "miracle" of the last years. I have been said that it was propaganda only.

But I am not happy for I´d been  right, after all.

Because this "protests" can give birth to something worse.

There´s no political right in Brazil. No opposition leader has emerged. It is an erratic movement. It is clear that the left will swallow it for its own purposes.  They will push for a radical left twist in the government.

This definitely is worse than what has been until now.

Olavo de Carvalho Interviewed on Latin America and Socialism

Olavo de Carvalho explaining Latin America for dummies...

Olavo de Carvalho Interviewed on Latin America and Socialism

The Intelligencer: Do you expect 21st Century Socialism to continue without President Chavez’s leadership?
Olavo: Hugo Chávez never—I repeat never—was the leader of the continental left. The São Paulo Forum’s general assemblies make all the important decisions and completely run the show, and there has never been the slightest sign of any serious disagreement among the Forum members. Chávez was never more than a decoy. It was created and used by the São Paulo Forum, which  in due course, will know how to create many others like him.
The Intelligencer: If so, who do you see as taking the mantle of leadership for 21st Century Socialism in the post-Chavez era?
Olavo: I think the disappearance of Chávez from the political scence is very beneficial to the São Paulo Forum, which now can continue its operations while keeping a low profile till it finds it suitable to create a new poster boy.
The Intelligencer: Do you believe Chavismo politics will continue in Venezuela without major changes?
Olavo: Any antichavista government that rises to power in Venezuela will be surrounded, isolated, and ruthlessly attacked by its neighbors until it becomes completely inoperable. 

Life as a project?

One of the most striking features of modern life is its daily evanescence. Not only are ourselves aged, but everything around us fades away quickly.
Nothing is built to last. "In the future everyone will be famous for 15 minutes," said Warhol, in an  evocation of Wilde, with certitude. Not that Warhol was a genius, but simply that he knew which way the wind blew, and let himself go.

Everything around us is ephemeral. Matter is ephemeral. Goods are ephemeral. The sense of timelessness of the human race seems to have been swept out of existence. We do not seek the eternal, beautiful in itself, the sublime, but the "up-to-date", what is "trendy" and all terms rationally empty that fill our cultural shelves nowadays.

The officially accepted explanation for this state is that the man, realized in the XIX Century, that he was no longer a reflection of God´s image, but simply the product of an "evolution" (or factory upgrade) of matter, just like rats, chimpanzees and armadillos. From this point the man stops to look at eternity as his arrival port and started to fight against the clock during his short reign life.

Modernity focuses on these two aspects: The concept of "evolution", concluding that what is newer is better because it is more advanced in evolutionary terms. This was the cultural consequence of the transportation of the concept of evolution from biologic to the culture field, with no half-stops. The bases of high culture were defeated.
The technique becomes the base "culture" of modernity. Science is the new Prometheus that stole the knowledge from God to men so we can build our own happiness, without divine intercession. Men is no longer interested in old concepts  such as "moral" or "justice". The newer the better. Endpoint.

Second phase: Younger generation takes control of the culture , by the mid '50s. In the United States appeared the prototype youth culture that will sweep the world. In the 60's it was radicalized into  "do not trust anyone over thirty" motto of the day.

Third phase: modernism "dies". After all science can not, itself, ensure "peace and security". The century that opened by the sign of modernity closes with a balance of two world wars. But man does not gave up. Rather than go back and recognize the error, invents the "post-modernity", which is simply the negation of rationality and existence itself.

The result is that Life is simple life now. Ephemeral and volatile, without much hope, chaotic, Darwinian struggle of the fittest, now transfigured by "most modern". Won by whoever has the I-Phone 5.

But I do not agree. The human being is not a giant Drosophila fly. Living just to feel what can be felt, "enjoining" what each season can gives us, should not be our only goal.

 
Our real goal is Eternity. Cause we are eternal, in the sense that anything or anyone that has existed can not become "nothing." Even though we are no longer here to witness it,  our history is.
 

It means that Life has to have a project. And it has. Our greatest mission is to learn about it.

Anatolyi Golitsyn revisited

My friend "perilous time" has updated the predictions of KGB defector Anatolyi Golitsyn in a new post:


"In his 1984 book New Lies for Old, KGB defector Anatoliy Golitsyn, who lived incognito for decades and who would be 86 years old if he is still alive, predicted that the Soviet communists would:

1. feign their demise, which took place in 1991 with the stage-managed collapse of the Soviet Union and the fake, temporary banning of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union;
2. eliminate any rational for NATO’s existence, which took place in 1991 with the so-called end of the Cold War and the integration of economically backward “ex”-communist states into the Western military alliance;
3. install a communist puppet in the White House, which took place in 1992, with the election of alleged KGB asset Bill Clinton, and again in 2008, with the election of avowed socialist Barack Hussein Obama, who has received the endorsement of the Communist Party USA; and
4. rebuild the red world order, which began in 1991 with the creation of the Commonwealth of “Independent” States (CIS) and, afterwards, numerous other international organizations across the post-Soviet space"

Finally, the truth about Soviet spy Alger Hiss

WND, reports a new book on one of the most influential communist spies inside the US more inner government circle during FDR years, Alger Hiss.


Finally, the truth about Soviet spy Alger Hiss: Former U.S. State Department official Alger Hiss was the darling of the Franklin Roosevelt Democrats and the architect of the United Nations.


That he was also a Soviet spy remains one of the most well-guarded secrets of the 20th century.

Clinton has 'serious concerns' on Russia... JPost - International

Clinton has 'serious concerns' on Russia... JPost - International: Clinton has 'serious concerns' on Russia vote

Wow, if it was Jimmy Carter, he would "approve" the elections in Russia, as he did for Hugo Chávez.

But I don´t trust Hillary. If she said she has "serious concerns", what it means?

"US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said on Monday she had "serious concerns" about the conduct of Russia's parliamentary elections and Russians deserved a full investigation of all reported irregularities"

The campaign for Sunday's election was marked by "limited political competition and a lack of fairness," observers from the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe and the Council of Europe's parliamentary assembly said.

The vote count "was characterized by frequent procedural violations and instances of apparent manipulation, including several serious indications of ballot box stuffing," the monitors said in their preliminary report.

Maybe it is time for the mantra "The communism is dead" along with "Russia is a democracy" to put aside.. Enough was allowed to Russia to oavertake its previous dominance over its former "satallite" republics...

The west turned aside to many things Russia did over the last years:

1) The bombings in Moscow - 1999. It was an FSB "job", according to deceased agent Alexaner Litvinenko.
2) Russia supported Saddan Hussein - It helped him to hide wmd in Syria
3) The invasion of Georgia and Ukraine, in 2008
4) The assassination of Polish PM in 2010, in a fabricated plane "accident"

Cuba: two women arrested; People started unrest

Cuban people is starting a riot? It was amazing that people tried to impede the guards to arrest these two brave women that dared to protest against the government in Cuba.

Off topic: soundcloud

Hi my friends..
I did not quit posting, but I am very busy lateley..

To not let you down, I send this little Xmas gift.
I recorded, as a hobby, some versions of classic oldies.
You can hear them here.

Enjoy!
http://soundcloud.com/luis-afonso

Is Libertarianism a Gnostic or Utopian Political Movement? | The Libertarian Standard

I´ve been reading some books on the occultist origins of the "progressive" movements and agreed they are profoundly founded in gnostic source.
I have been wondered if the so-called "rationalist" libertarian apply to the same group. For me it seems yes. This article shred some light on the issue.
Good reading.
Is Libertarianism a Gnostic or Utopian Political Movement? | The Libertarian Standard