What is a Miracle? by Olavo de Carvalho

VoegelinView What is a Miracle?

To explain a fact by a supernatural cause [is to presuppose] that there are facts with non-supernatural causes, but since God, theologically speaking, is the ultimate or first cause of everything that happens, then that is a merely tautological statement; to say that something happened because God wanted it to happen is to imply that other things may happen without God wanting them to, which is contradictory to the definition of God as omnipotent and as first cause. So I cannot understand how it is that a scientific investigation can be carried out upon such erroneous logical foundations by both those who accept the existence of the miraculous and those who do not.

Facebook | Sarah Palin: Mr. President, is a strong America a problem?

Image via Wikipedia

From Sarah Palin Facebook page:
Mr. President, is a strong America a problem?

Asked this week about his faltering efforts to advance the Middle East peace process, President Obama did something remarkable. In front of some 47 foreign leaders and hundreds of reporters from all over the world, President Obama said that “whether we like it or not, we remain a dominant military superpower.”

Whether we like it or not? Most Americans do like it. America’s military may be one of the greatest forces for good the world has ever seen, liberating countless millions from tyranny, slavery, and oppression over the last 234 years. As a dominant superpower, the United States has won wars hot and cold; our military has advanced the cause of freedom in Iraq and Afghanistan and kept authoritarian powers like Russia and China in check.

It is in America’s and the world’s interests for our country to remain a dominant military superpower, but under our great country’s new leadership that dominance seems to be slipping away. President Obama has ended production of the F-22, the most advanced fighter jet this country has ever built. He’s gutted our missile defense program by eliminating shield resources in strategic places including Alaska. And he’s ended the program to build a new generation of nuclear weapons that would have ensured the reliability of our nuclear deterrent well into the future. All this is in the context of the country’s unsustainable debt that could further limit defense spending. As one defense expert recently explained:

The president is looking to eliminate the last vestiges of the Reagan-era buildup. Once the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are “ended” (not “won”), the arms control treaties signed, and defense budgets held at historic lows while social entitlements and debt service rise to near-European levels, the era of American superpower will have passed.

The truth is this: by his actions we see a president who seems to be much more comfortable with an American military that isn’t quite so dominant and who feels the need to apologize for America when he travels overseas. Could it be a lack of faith in American exceptionalism? The fact is that America and our allies are safer when we are a dominant military superpower – whether President Obama likes it or not.

- Sarah Palin

Related articles by Zemanta:

• Sarah Palin: Where Is Obama's 'Faith In American Exceptionalism?'
• Palin: We like it, Mr. President!

Jeffrey Nyquist has the same perception: Poland PM was killed..

Past Global Analysis - J. R. Nyquist "Decapitation by Mishap" 04/16/2010

President Kaczynski, of course, is yet criticized in the press as a "Russophobe." But in reality President Kaczynski was not sufficiently fearful -- otherwise he would still be alive. After all, Kaczynski was anti-Communist, which is hardly a safe occupation for an East European politician. This was underscored in 1984 by KGB defector Anatoliy Golitsyn who wrote that a leader "who is involved in furthering an effective counterstrategy against the communists should not visit communist countries or take part in any summit meetings with their leaders." He warned that such visits were opportunities for assassination.

Of course, the Soviet Union and its Communist Party no longer exists. Right?

Cubanology Bi-Weekly Update

Vietnam and Cuba: How soon they forget « THE CUBANOLOGY BI-WEEKLY and SPECIAL ARTICLES BLOG

Powered by ScribeFire.

Obama is "mad lunatic" and Insane, according to Sarkozy

Nicolas Sarkozy Calls Barack Obama a "mad Lunatic" or "insane" Due to Refusal to Listen to What World is Saying - Associated Content - associatedcontent.com

More specifically, even, Sarkozy was also "appalled" at what the "vision" of the world should be under Obama's supreme and almighty "guidance." Obama's apparent "vision" of what the world should be—and this will come as no surprise to Obama critics who already find him to be an appeaser towards Islam—is one in which the world embraces Islam, something he's already gone to great lengths in doing in the first year of his administration. Examples are his submissive speech in Egypt last year; his lifting of the Bush-era ban on radical cleric Tariq Ramadan from entering the US; and his order to ban the words "Islamic extremism" and "jihad" when talking about the enemy.

Powered by ScribeFire.

Polish Presidente Was Killed By The Left

President has so much to be hating by:

Image via Wikipedia

-Euro-socialists
-Liberals
-Communists (Russia, in special)
-Gays

This "accident" (I do not saw it, but it was in Russia, Kaczynski was a real conservative anti-communist) is pretty useful.

Here some views of Mr. Kaczynski.

Poland opts for Conservative Kaczynski

by Ekke Overbeek

24-10-2005

(...)

Euro-sceptic
Mr Kaczynski also has political extremists to thank for his victory, including the xenophobic 'Catholic' radio station, Radio Maryja, which enjoys considerable influence in conservative circles. Populist, anti-European politician Andrzej Lepper - who took 15 percent of the vote as a candidate in the first round of the presidential elections - also threw his weight behind Mr Kaczynski in the second round. Meanwhile, Mr Kaczynski has promised Mr Lepper a 'renegotiation' of the terms under which Poland joined the EU in May last year.

As Mayor of Warsaw, Lech Kaczynski made international news when he banned a march for gay and lesbian rights in the city during the summer. He maintains that homosexuals should not make a public display of their sexual orientation. In the run-up to the elections, he also managed to play on people's fears of foreigners, Germans and 'liberals'.

At the beginning of the 1990s, the Kaczynski twins were both advisors to then-President Lech Walesa. However, they later fell out with the president, alleging that he was tied to the apron strings of the communists. Now, some 15 years later, the two brothers still want to settle the score with the former communists, who they claim have retained too much influence in the new Poland. For this purpose, they want to see a commission for truth and justice established (..)

Do you see my remarks? It is consistent with Golitsyn´s predictions on New Lies For Old, that the movemte "Solidarnosc" was a fake grassroots movemente and Lech Walesa was a puppet of the communist.
Just like Lula da Silva in Brazil.

So his killing is good for all EU-centrist, anti-catholic, communist. Beware conservative leaders of Europe!

Oh, I was forgetting to mention other of his enemies: The gay.
Read what they are writing on Kaczynski´s death.

Polish President who said homosexuality will destroy human race feared dead in plane crash - from Pink News - all the latest gay news from the gay community - Pink News: "Polish President Lech Kaczynski who once said that the promotion of homosexuality would lead to the eventual destruction of the human race is believed to have died in a plane crash near Smolensk in Russia. Kaczynski's right wing Law and Justice party are in an alliance with the British Conservative party in the European Parliament

."

Related articles by Zemanta

• Kaczynski was nationalist, pro-U.S. conservative (cbc.ca)

Statistics On Pedophiles

Image via Wikipedia

For those who thinks your children will be safer on a school than in a Catholic Church or Seminarium, one sample date, provided by the Janell Matula that runs Texas Amber Child Safety Network, according to this myspace page.

Statistics On Pedophiles - Blog MySpace | de Against Their Will:

"The best estimate is that 15% of students will be sexually abused by a member of the school staff during their school career.
•Though, when the American Association of University Women Foundation surveyed more than 1,600 students in eighth through 11th grade, 25 percent of the girls and 10 percent of the boys who said they had been harassed or abused said the harasser was a school employee.
•The number of K-12 public and private school students in 1996 who have been or will be sexually abused by a member of the school staff is nearly 7 million of 51,331,000.
•Between 1% and 5% of teachers sexually abuse or harass students.
•At least a quarter of all school districts in the United States have dealt with a case of staff sexual abuse in the past ten years.
•Most cases of sexual abuse of students by teachers are never reported.
•In nearly half of the cases, suspects were accused of abusing more than one student.
•Only two cases were cases of false accusations; less than 1 percent of the cases studied."

Remembering 1964/Brazil: Lies and Liars

Image via Wikipedia

Image via Wikipedia
Brasilia - Brazil´s Capital

In 1964 Brazil almost turned into a Cuban-like Comunist regime. But "we, the people" (house wives, small businessmen, workers, church and families) went to the streets to ask to military to do something to stop the communist momentum.
It was done, without firing a single bullet... Like Reagan did with communism in Europe in 1989/90.
Ok, the military regime lasted more than twenty years, it turned into a semi-socialized regime (with a boom of "public" industries, universities and monopolies and even councils to control the prices. Yes, the prices were defined by the government!) and allowed the free flow of ideas and desinformation from the left.
One of them was that the "coup" in 1964 was invented and controlled by the American.

In 2001, Olavo de Carvalho, sent a challenge to the press to interview the former Czech agent Ladislav Bittman, who wrote a book "The KGB and the Soviet Disinformation" informing some operations executed in Brazil with the goal of make believe that US was on the eve of invading the country.

In 2005, I interviewed Ladislav (now known as Lawrence) by mail to know what was the newspaper funded by the KGB in Brazil to spread such disinformation. The newspaper was called "O Semanario" (The Weekly).

Now I wrote an article following the story. And giving the names of people involved with this newspaper.
More than five years after, the press is still ignoring those facts.

I could find two names involved with the spread of soviet propaganda in the sixties in Brazil.
One of them was Jose Joffily, a former state deputy for PSD party. He was a "nationalist" politician and still today a very respected name in my country.
I cannot state that he knew all the details of the operation (called "Thomas Mann", the name of the foreign secretary of US, at that time) or if he was just an useful idiot.

The other involved was Jose Frejat. Frejat was the chief-writer of the newspaper. It is hard to say that, being the main writer, he did not know about who were his real bosses. Jose Frejat is a very respected politician in Brazil.

If were in the US, how media would react to this? I imagine many different ways, except the silence.
But it was this the result of it so far.

It proves that there´s no real or independent press in my country.


Brazilian article: Nadando contra a Maré... Vermelha: Relembrando 1964

Related news and articles:

• From New American: Olavo de Carvalho on Communism in Latin America
• From Goggle news: Newspaper- Ladislav Bittman
  

Powered by ScribeFire.

From New American: Olavo de Carvalho on Communism in Latin America

The New American site has published an interview with Olavo de Carvalho.

Olavo de Carvalho on Communism in Latin America

Olavo de Carvalho on Communism in Latin America | Print | E-mail
Written by Alex Newman
Monday, 15 March 2010 01:00

Olavo de Carvalho, an author and philosopher, is renowned as one of Brazil’s preeminent thinkers. He played a leading role in exposing subversive leftist organizations like the Foro de São Paulo in his work as a writer for some of Brazil’s most influential publications. In the course of writing an article about the socialist resurgence in Latin America, I interviewed Carvalho for The New American magazine.

The New American: Could you please tell me a little bit about yourself, your background, your work, your philosophy, and what motivated you to become involved in exposing the Foro de São Paulo?

Olavo de Carvalho: Notwithstanding having been a leftist militant as a teenager, I lost any interest in politics after severing my ties with the Left when I was 20 years old in 1969. From that time on, until I was 38, I worked as a text editor for newspapers and magazines and dedicated my free time to the study of philosophy, literature, cultural history, ancient esoteric traditions, and comparative religion. Though I delivered an occasional lecture here and there, I was happy to live as an anonymous scholar, perfectly unknown to public opinion and academic circles. It was only in the late ’80s that my attention was drawn to the ongoing destruction of high culture in Brazil, and I started to take notes on the alarming stupidities that were published in ever growing quantities by very influential Brazilian opinion makers, both academic and journalistic. Bit by bit I grasped the political factors that had generated that state of affairs, and in 1993 I wrote a book, The New Age and the Cultural Revolution, about the overtaking of higher education by the communist militancy, which was not at all interested in high culture, but only in gaining political power and profiting from the general dumbing down of Brazilian students. In 1995 I wrote The Garden of Afflictions, a study on the evolution of the idea of “Empire” in the West, since the times of Julius Caesar to the advent of the New World Order.... The following year I collected my notes about Brazilian cultural decay and published them under the title of The Collective Imbecile, ... leading some big newspapers to hire me as a weekly political columnist.... Meanwhile, I had founded an electronic newspaper, Mídia Sem Máscara (“Unmasked Media”), that intended to correct the most flagrant distortions of the news published by the big media.... In 2005, as I was getting tired of receiving weekly death threats from leftist maniacs, I found it was a good idea to accept a job as a Washington foreign correspondent that was offered to me by a traditional Brazilian business newspaper, the Diário do Comércio (“Business Daily”), and here I am living in Virginia with my family. I love to be here, because Americans, though already infected by the neo-communist virus, are not yet so stupid as Brazilians have become.

TNA: To what extent has the leftist movement gained power in Latin America? What factors led to this resurgence and how was it possible?

Carvalho: Communist and pro-communist parties rule about a dozen Latin American countries today. This fact, by itself, is enough to prove that the “end of communism,” proclaimed by the Right soon after the fall of the Soviet Union, is a myth. World communism was never only an appendix of the USSR. It actually created the USSR, not the other way around. It existed a century before the Russian Revolution and continued to exist after the nominal extinction of Soviet power. What made the resurgence of communism easier — not only in Latin America, but around the world — was the cowardly timidity of Western right-wingers who, instead of taking the opportunity of the fall of the USSR to punish the communists for their crimes, chose instead a policy of “extending them a hand,” as if asking for their pardon for having defeated them, and offering them all sorts of aid, enabling them to reappear with a new or attenuated identity, even protecting them from being called “communists” (the fashionable euphemism is now “populism”). I believe that this absurd surrender of the winners was also stimulated by powerful globalist circles, whose interest in establishing worldwide bureaucratic controls converges with the objectives of the communists. The number of billionaire companies which came to openly contribute to leftist parties is enormous. I call “meta-capitalists” the individuals and groups which grew so wealthy with the market economy that they can’t stand anymore being at the mercy of the free market and seek, instead, to control everything, supporting bureaucracy instead of capitalism. Meta-capitalists are natural allies of the communists.

An event that clearly symbolizes this union of apparent adversaries was the tributes paid to Lula, the Brazilian President, who in the same week was honored by the World Economic Forum in Davos, for his conversion to capitalism, and by the São Paulo Forum, for his allegiance to communism. The contradiction is only apparent. At the World Social Forum in Porto Alegre, which for public opinion embodies the opposite of the Davos Forum, the main demand was for a greater control over the world economy by big international organizations. Nobody there asked for shutting down the IMF or the World Bank, what they wanted was the integration of “civil society” — i.e., the World Social Forum — into those organizations. Many European NGOs [non-governmental organizations] which participate in the World Social Forum have a seat at the meetings of the World Bank and other international organizations. The “ideological” contrast serves only as propaganda. What we have is a gigantic symbiosis of all globalist and statist forces around the world.

TNA: How have the Foro de São Paulo and its members managed to become so influential? How can they be stopped?

Carvalho: The São Paulo Forum, created by Luis Inacio Lula da Silva and Fidel Castro in 1990 with the goal of regaining in Latin America what had been lost in Eastern Europe, is the strategic command of the communist and pro-communist movement in the continent. Its membership includes over 100 legal political parties as well as criminal organizations of drug traffickers and kidnappers, such as the FARC (“Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia”) and the Chilean MIR (“Movimiento de Izquierda Revolucionaria”). Legal parties cover up the activities of criminal groups, and these provide undercover financial resources to legal parties.... During 16 years big media and the establishment, in Latin America and in the United States, refused to touch upon the subject, handing to the strategists of the communist revolution the protection of silence. Some of them, such as the expert in Brazilian affairs at the Council on Foreign Relations, Kenneth Maxwell, even openly denied the existence of the Forum, though by that time I had already published, in my electronic newspaper Mídia Sem Máscara, the complete official proceedings of its annual meetings, which revealed with total clarity the scope of its ambitions and goals.

The Forum can only be stopped if the legal political parties in its membership are taken to court for the criminal activities covered up and protected by the organization. Brazilian President Lula, who chaired the Forum for 12 years, signed in 2001 an agreement of full support to the FARC, the same organization which provides training and military assistance to criminal gangs in Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo, such as the PCC (“First Command of the Capital”) and the “Red Command,” which kill tens of thousands of Brazilian citizens every year. When FARC or MIR agents are arrested in Brazil, immediately Lula’s [Workers’] Party, the PT [Portuguese: Portido dos Trabalhadores], acts to free them. What is this if not complicity in crime? ... Meanwhile, communist militants keep securing positions in the judiciary, so that as time goes by any lawsuit brought against this alliance of leftists and criminals becomes ever more unlikely to succeed.

TNA: What role have the Brazilian government and Lula in particular played in expanding the leftist movement’s power in Latin America? Is Lula a radical leftist, a moderate, or somewhere in between? What do his policies -indicate?

Carvalho: Lula’s ideological convictions don’t really matter, because they don’t even seem to exist. What exists is his loyalty to his cohorts in the militancy and to the commitments he made to the entities of the São Paulo Forum, which, if unfulfilled, would bring against him all the Latin American Left, leaving him without any support, not even from the Right, which is by now so weak that its support is worthless. A mediocre man doesn’t act out of convictions, but according to the objective pressures of his group of reference. It’s a waste of time to ask whether he “is” a true communist within himself or not. Within Lula there is only emptiness and meanness, but around him there is a well-organized structure of revolutionary power which he serves well and will never stop serving.

Foreign observers let themselves be impressed (or pretended to do so) by Lula’s “orthodox” economic policy and therefore concluded that he had changed his ideology. This is total nonsense. Lula only adopted these policies so that he would not have to fight two fronts simultaneously. Following the example of Lenin’s “New Economic Policy,” he sought to appease foreign investors while consolidating the power of leftist organizations in internal politics (using copious amounts of public money to finance them), and boycotting the Right in such a way that it is not able, as he himself recently declared, even to present its own candidate in the upcoming presidential elections [in October]. This will be the third presidential election without any right-wing candidate. As soon as it felt that the control of the Left over the country had been consolidated, the ruling party threw off its mask of moderation and began to propose radical measures such as state control over the media, the right of leftist organizations to invade and take rural properties as they see fit, etc.

TNA: Do you see the leftist resurgence as a monolithic threat under central control or rather as a splintered movement with various factions? Why? Assuming they exist, who are the leaders?

Carvalho: Throughout history the revolutionary movement has never depended on monolithic control to be able to grow and prosper. Even during the period of Soviet hegemony, the expansion of communism coexisted perfectly well with the deep internal dissent that separated the Soviets from the Chinese and from the radicalism of Latin America guerrillas. In the last dec-ades, the communist movement has perfected even more its capacity to deal with a variety of internal dissidences, using them as camouflage and as instruments to adapt itself to local situations. The linear party hierarchy, which had always been more an appearance than a reality, has been totally replaced by a flexible organization of “networks” connected via the Internet.... In Latin America, the leadership of the revolutionary movement still belongs to the founders of the São Paulo Forum: Lula, Marco Aurélio Garcia, Ricardo Kotscho, and others.

TNA: What role have Hugo Chavez and Venezuelan Petrodollars played in this resurgence? Is the Cuban government an important player?

Carvalho: Hugo Chavez is only a scarecrow that the Latin American Left waves before the world to distract the attention away from the São Paulo Forum, which is the true strategic command of the Latin American revolution. Cuba and Venezuela are important as shelters for terrorists and drug traffickers. In Venezuela and other Spanish-speaking countries ruled by the São Paulo Forum, there is strong and organized opposition, while in Brazil all that is left is the Left itself, which controls the scene absolutely.

TNA: How significant and deep are the ties of leftist leaders and political parties to terrorism and crime?

Carvalho: In Brazil, federal judge Odilon de Oliveira gathered proofs showing that FARC’s narco-guerrillas ... control a large chunk of local criminality. As a result, he became the most persecuted man in Latin America and now has to live as a prisoner in his own office, not being able even to go out to visit his family.... The FARC also provide guerrilla training for the militants of the “Landless Movement” (MST), an ironic name because that entity is one of the biggest landowners in Brazil today. The MST invades farms, destroys produce and equipment, sends away the (true) workers, and is invariably rewarded for its actions, receiving enormous sums of federal monies and the property of the invaded farms. Even more ironically, the main factor for Brazil’s economic success is the productivity of its big farms.... As for the Cuban government, its connections to drug trafficking have been proved several years ago in the book The Mafia from Havana: The Cuban Cosa Nostra.... The same connections exist with the Venezuelan government, as demonstrated by a report of the U.S. Congress from July 2009.... In Brazil, the alliance between the FARC and local criminal gangs has made it absolutely impossible to control crime activity. Nowadays, some 50,000 Brazilians are murdered every year. Instead of repressing the gangs that produce this insanity, the government grants them territorial autonomy and is even cynical enough to propose, as a remedy, disarming the honest population.

TNA: To what extent and in what way is the U.S. government involved in the region?

Carvalho: For several decades now, the attitude of the American government in the area has been ambiguous, to say the least. Bill Clinton’s Plan Colombia only offered economic and military aid to the Colombian government on the explicit condition that ... criminal organizations of a political nature be preserved [from] any damage. The result was that the old cartels were destroyed and the FARC became the absolute rulers of drug trafficking in the continent. In reality this kind of “war on drugs” is a war that favors the Left against Latin America. The Department of State is well informed about the São Paulo forum and its Brazilian leadership. When it supports Lula under the pretext that he is “a moderate,” in contrast with the “radical” Hugo Chavez, it is actually camouflaging the real danger so that it may grow sheltered from the sight of any intruder.

TNA: What role are multilateral and supranational institutions like ALBA, MERCOSUR, the Andean Community, and UNASUR playing in all of this? Could the integration process be used to eventually absorb all of Latin America under authoritarian control?

Carvalho: All these organizations were created under the inspiration of the idea of free trade, and there were even some people who saw in them a sign of formidable capitalist progress. However, we now understand that free trade is a double-edged sword, which can also be used to dissolve national sovereignties and to build upon their rubble a new structure of supranational power. Many political analysts who only look at things from an economic point of view fail to notice such danger. They imagine that the expansion of commercial ties is by itself a vaccine against communism.... Well, in today’s Latin America, the Left practically has the monopoly of political action in its hands, and indeed this is so much so that all those organizations you have mentioned — all of them — are being used for the creation of a kind of Union of Latin American Socialist Republics.

TNA: How serious is the threat of this resurgence? What do you see happening in both the near future and the long run?

Carvalho: There is no unified answer that applies to all Latin America. The situation is different in each country. For example, however unbelievable it may seem, there is a strong and organized resistance against the rise of neo-communism in Venezuela. Colombia, likewise, is a remarkable center of resistance. On the other hand, nowhere else has the Right been so utterly destroyed as it has been in Brazil, which is, for this very reason, the headquarters of Latin American revolution. When former Venezuelan presidential candidate Alejandro Peña set up UnoAmerica (Association of Democratic Organizations of the Americas), the only international organization devoted to fighting communism, he found no difficulty in obtaining effective support in most of the Spanish-speaking countries, but he has always had great difficulties finding support in Brazil.... In other countries, however, the Left is not so culturally hegemonic, which has made possible the organization of an effective and strong anti-communist action. From this point of view, then, Venezuela is in a better situation than Brazil, for if in the former country, the Right has been oppressed, in the latter it has already died, being now necessary to create a new Right out of nothing. In this sense, American political analysts are always getting it all backwards: They are alarmed at Venezuela and do not understand that the headquarters of the revolution is in Brazil.

Photo: Olavo de Carvalho

Powered by ScribeFire.

Orlando Zapata Tamayo - A protest

YouTube - Orlando Zapata Tamayo Art Protest NYC OZT

This Art Video is the creation of the Cuban Artist Geandy Pavon. Who Proyected the image of Orlando Zapata Tamayo upon the facade of the Cuban Mission to The UN building in NYC.

tiphat Jose Reyes (cubanology.com)

Carlos Alberto Montaner "finally" understands Lula da Silva and the Sao Paulo Forum

My friend Heitor de Paola writes on the disappointment of Carlos A. Montaner towards Lula.

Montaner wrote an article saying he´s "surprise" by the Lula´s alignment to the Castros. But wrote, in the same text the following:

Squandering Brazil's future

"Actually, Lula da Silva's behavior is not surprising. In 1990, when the Berlin Wall went down, the leader of the Workers Party hastened to create the Sao Paulo Forum with Fidel Castro to coordinate collaboration among all the violent and antidemocratic forces of Latin America. Among them were the narcoterrorist guerrillas of the FARC and the ELN in Colombia, a dozen communist parties in a dozen other countries, the FSLN in Nicaragua, the FMLN in El Salvador and the URGN in Guatemala."

So, Montaner always "knew" or he is surprised?

According to de Paola,

"The author does not decide: who is Lula? A communist ally of Fidel for 20 years? A man of weak intellect, the plaything of Marxist radicals? Someone who until recently followed the right path and was admired by the author and around the world and suddenly took the path of evil? This indecision made me change my point of view with respect to Montaner. Initially, for reasons I will clarify now, I thought I would treat him as a hypocrite and a liar. Then I realized that even a visit to Cuba, including the episode Zelaya, Montaner still believed in the theory developed by Stephen Johnson [[1]], the Heritage Foundation , on the existence of two in Ibero left: a 'carnivorous', represented by Chavez, and 'vegetarian', represented by Lula. I therefore believe that Montaner is not only a hypocrite, but also a 'Perfect Latin American Idiot', Century version."



More:


"In an article published in Portuguese by newspaper 'O Estado de São Paulo' in 12/03/2010, 'Squandereding Brazil´s Future' Carlos Alberto Montaner said Lula disappointed him because this' adopted, cruelly, the view of his friend Fidel Castro. " He is general disappointment in international diplomacy, because, according assured 'a Latin American president who knows you well (as Lula), "" It seemed like Lula, with his sympathy and the good time that his country is experiencing, would turn Brazil great power in Latin America. False. He destroyed the possibility to align with the Castros, Chavez and Ahmadinejad. No nation relies more seriously in Brazil.

A careful reading of the text shows a major inconsistency. However Montaner says that Lula has adopted the view of Fidel - without saying when, looking like it was recently when he was in Cuba - now says that "the behavior of squid is not surprising 'and is a dissertation for the first time on the Forum Sao Paulo like authority on the subject - which, until then, peremptorily refused - to take in the end, the view that the President Lula and who knows, that it suffers from a 'painful fragility intellectual', and only 'a superstition attached to the union of the class struggle' and that 'takes the analysis of Marxist radicals who explained to her reality as a struggle between good and bad'. It also bets the hunch of a former U.S. ambassador that "Lula is a stubborn enemy of the West and, especially, the U.S., although it relates to hide it '.

In May 2005 when, at a Roundtable on Freedom Agenda for the Americas Atlas Liberty Forum in Miami, after defending the agenda based on the left, so-called moderate, to face the other left, so-called radical left with this gem: "I believe José Dirceu has changed his ideology." Since I and other Brazilians stunned Montaner discussed privately after the meeting, dropped the mask of arrogance and peremptory "believe" transmuted into a simple "for me, at least, it seems to be so". This episode is narrated in more detail in my article "The Three Stooges". Since then several articles written with grace and Salgueiro, Carlos Azambuja, Villamarin Pulido, Armando Valladares, Alejandro Esclusa - not to mention the countless texts Olavo de Carvalho and the original complaint by Professor Constantine Menges - most of which were sent to Montaner, and received with absolute silence."
(..)

See the full translated by google article here

Powered by ScribeFire.

Lula Reveals His True Identity...Again

The episode of Orlando Zapata, and the following developments, revealed how Lula da Silva, the Brazilian President, is "de facto" the President of The Sao Paulo Forum disguised as Brazil´s President.
Now, another clue of the same.

President of Brazil Refuses to Lay Wreath - News Briefs - Israel National News

President of Brazil Refuses to Lay Wreath

Reported: 21:56 PM - Mar/14/10
Follow Israel news briefs on Twitter and Facebook

(IsraelNN.com) President of Brazil, Lula da Silva, who arrived this evening (Sunday) to visit Israel, refused to visit Mount Herzl and lay a wreath on the grave of Theodor Herzl.

In response to his announcement, Hagai Merom, whose job it is to escort the heads of state at the ceremony at the tomb of Herzl, said that the decision insults the accepted rules of politeness and friendship between countries.

Powered by ScribeFire.

World Net Weekly gone too far?

World Net weekly, a new magazine from Joseph Farah (from World Net Daily) has gone too far???

I don´t think so. It is an Obama version of the classic MAD cover, depicting Alfred E. Neuman as a tomato-ed presidential candidate.
Thumbs up!!

Superstore.WND.com - A WorldNetDaily Exclusive!

Powered by ScribeFire.

Blog on Cuba: "Cuba Noticias Dissidentes"

O found a very good blog on Cuba.
Cuba noticias disidentes

José Reyes´ Cubanology: The Dead (Tamayo) and the Deaf (Human Rights Organizations)

My friend Jose Reyes from Cubanology show how Human Rights institution turns deaf when the words like "torture", "execution", "prisioner" and "Cuba" are in the same sentence.
Viva Zapata!

Futile Reports of Human Rights abuse in Cuba and the DEATH of Orlando Zapata Tamayo « THE CUBANOLOGY BI-WEEKLY and SPECIAL ARTICLES BLOG

Powered by ScribeFire.

Orlando Zapata Tamayo dies while Brazil´s President do nothing: It is time to dump Lula!

Lula meets Fidel in Cuba (portuguese)
Lula meets Fidel in Cuba (translated)

Raul says he regrets the death of Orlando, but says it was US fault. "There were no tortures (in Cuba), no execution. It only happens in the (American) base of Guantánamo".

Lula, before the trip, received an open letter from  50 Cuban political prisioners to interced in favour their liberation, particularly for Tamayo. But Lula says he did not received any "letter". In that letter it was stated that "the Brazilian President could be a magnificent interlocutor to make the (Cuban) government decide to implement social and economic reformation that Cuba needs urgently, and to advance in relation to the human rights" (accordingly to "publico" - portugal).

In Brazil, it seems that the press is submerged in the same hypocritical world view of many  - if US" tortures" what the problem with Cuba? - saying that was "bad luck" for Lula to arrive in Cuba in the exact same day that Tamayo died.  In Brazil´s press, all that goes against the all-left-sanctity (Cuba, Venezuela) is written between quotes, so Tamayo was a "prisoner of conscience" not a prisioner of conscience.

But did I say something on Brazilian press? Sorry, It is dead. We must not to lose time with this. It is just a long hammering of heartless activist disguised as journalist.
 
What I really regret is why many, many people still see Lula as a kind of Fox News of LA politics. e.g.  "fair and balanced", but he is not.
Again: The man those prisoners tried to ask to help them is the man that created the beast. Lula da Silva is the man that created, the New Komintern, aka "Foro de Sao Paulo" in 1990.
Many, even in Brazil, believe Lula is a kind of "prisoner of conscience" of his party - Partido dos Trabalhadores (PT), saying his not Marxist anymore, but in fact a pragmatist free-market apologist, that concedes some of leftist rhetoric just to calm down his radicals.
But he is not. He created FSP (foro de sao paulo) along with his party  and some of the worst terrorist entities in the LA, as FARC (yes, las "Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia") among others.
Brazil, since Lula has gained power, became a free space for drug smugglers, because FARC is the main drug supplier in Latin America.

It is time to the people abroad, in Europe (here in Portugal, for example, many people say good things on Lula), in US (GWB thought that Lula could stop Chávez.. He acted on Chávez just like US handled the fake "URSS-China split": giving more to Lula and Brazil believing that it will weakens Chávez. But just like Golitsyn has told us on his books "New Lies For Old" and "Perestroika Deception", URSS and China share the gains of the "play the China/ URSS card" while fooling US, Lula and Chávez fooled US - that believe Lula could guarantee democracy in the continent ).
It was all written, for those who know to read. if you know something on Antonio Gramsci (Joseph Farah from WND seems to know it, too), Anatolyi  Golitsyn, and others, you can separate good from evil.

It is time for the whole world and specially America (South, Central and North) to dump Lula da Silva. Let´s wake up??


Links:
Lula and Foro de Sao Paulo (from Olavo de Carvalho´s page).
The actual status of the Soviet Deception Plan (from Once Upon a Time in the West blog)

Powered by ScribeFire.

A complete list of things caused by Global Warming.

A complete list of things caused by global warming.
tiphat: ACR group

From acne (?) to "witchcraft executions", this is a comprehensive list of (not all) articles describing the effects of the "global warming" on human life.

It is funny to see these quotes: "snowfall decrease, snowfall increase, snowfall heavy, snow thicker"

Powered by ScribeFire.

Brazil: The End of Transition

Lula da Silva, the friend of Mr. Ahmajinehad and Chávez; The founder of the new Comintern (Foro de Sao Paulo) along with old & new comunist/terrorist groups like FARC, at the end of his second term, decided to step on the gas in his real objectives.

He signed a plan called "Third National Plan for Human Rights", that despite its naive title means: to transform all terrorist-now-in-power in "heroes" while the military that defeated them in the sixties in "villains".
But there more: the promotion of abortion as a "human right" among other things.
Read the Olavo de Carvalho´s article, translated below.

Google Google Tradutor

The Third National Plan for Human Rights has two major goals: (1) inhibit or suppress, through fear of legal sanctions, all resistance to the terrorism of the left, past, present or future, (2) deliver the revolutionary organizations, euphemistically called " social movements ", the total power on the farm in Brazil.
The two goals are different only in appearance. The first establishes the right to communist terrorism, the second is those who practice in rural judges of their own sovereign acts.

The first sense of purpose is not limited, of course, the purely symbolic gesture to send nonagenarians to jail (although there it has its usefulness, the psychological point of view). It aims to enshrine as a legal rule of "asymmetrical warfare", where one side gets all the rights and the other with all the obligations, responsibilities and obligations.

Powered by ScribeFire.

From Heitor de Paola´s Blog: Hugo Chávez, Now Against All

My friend Heitor de Paola, one of most reliable sources on LA, published this article in his blog.
Here´s the translation to english.

Google Google Tradutor

Hugo Chávez, now against all

EMÍLIO CÁRDENAS

The management (if you can call it that) government of Hugo Chávez has left Venezuela plunged into the greatest chaos. Water rationing galloping inflation and electricity shortages lack of press freedom and social polarization of opinion extreme violence and insecurity as elsewhere in Latin America and a noticeable drop in living standards of everyone, without exception now.


These harsh circumstances, as sooner or later going to happen, have almost terminally discredited the Caribbean.  A point such that recent opinion polls reveal a solid 62% of Venezuelans who do not trust him. That does not believe him then.  That is sick of him.  What, suddenly, clearly shows what we all suspected: a prodigal Chavez (with the money of others) for ideological reasons, whose total lack of fitness to govern is absolutely undeniable.

Powered by ScribeFire.

VENEZUELA: Confirmado el fin de la Democracia

Sorry.
This is in Spanish.
I don´t have much time to translate this.
The translated version of this page is here (thanks to google).
It was e-mail me from a friend in Venezuela (LuisaEloisa).

La llegada de Ramiro Valdez a Venezuela marca el fin de la Democracia y confirma que Hugo Chávez ha trabajado para entregarle el país al comunismo cubano.

www.Patriciapoleo.com

El anuncio que hiciera Hugo Chávez el pasado martes acerca de la llegada a Venezuela del cubano Ramiro Valdez, para cumplir misiones de Gobierno, no es más que la consumación del arrebatón final.

La presencia de Ramiro Valdez en Venezuela, confirma que Hugo Chávez y quienes lo han acompañado durante 11 años de gobierno, han estado trabajando todo el tiempo en la entrega de la nación a la secta comunista del Caribe, que siempre intentó apoderarse del país, pero que también siempre se encontraba con fuertes muros democráticos…hasta ahora, pues.

En 11 años de Gobierno de Hugo Chávez, el resumen de la gestión es un país donde se han alzado pocas voces para alertar y enfrentarse a la entrega criminal del país, voces inaudibles por cierto para una mayoría que estaba solo pendiente de meterle mano a lo suyo. Por un lado, está el noble y humilde pueblo que aferrado a su eterna esperanza de un futuro mejor alzaba sus manos para pedir y recibir lo que les ha sido negado a través de los años. Del otro lado, una aberrante explosión de oportunismo, ambición y poder desató una pandemia de ego que significó la destrucción de dignidad, principios y valores esenciales de vida y sana convivencia. Desde ese momento, la vida de los ciudadanos pasó a un segundo plano sin ninguna importancia.

La llegada del Comandante cubano Ramiro Valdez, marca la entrada triunfal de los bárbaros a Venezuela. No hay nada que hacer, por ahora. Se ha consumado la traición a la patria. Venezuela fue tomada por una fuerza invasora sin disparar ni un tiro, pues los ciudadanos que han debido defenderla estaban muy ocupados en recoger billetes del piso unos y otros, de llenar las bóvedas forjadas con el botín saqueado. El resumen es que los ciudadanos no hemos sabido defender a Venezuela, no hemos respetado el futuro de nuestros hijos y nietos y los líderes virtuales y mediáticos se mantienen indiferentes ante la afrenta de traición a la patria cometida por quien juró defenderla.

Parece que para el país entero es insignificante que un militar portando uniforme de opresión, llegue al país a dirigir y disponer de los bienes y riqueza que por mandato popular le fuera entregado para su mejor cuido y administració n, y además se los ceda a la secta comunista cubana. Para esa dirigencia parece que la presencia y entrada triunfal de la bota invasora cubana no tiene mayor significación frente al reto que ellos tienen de convertirse en diputados el próximo 26 de septiembre. Porque no entienden que no hay septiembre sin luz; con una PDVSA a punto de colapsar; no hay septiembre con una deuda pública a punto de insolventar; no hay septiembre sin pueblo; no hay septiembre sin instituciones; no hay septiembre sin Constitución; no hay septiembre con una Fuerza Armada rendida ante el invasor.

La entrada de Ramiro Valdez uniformado a Caracas es el fin de nuestra democracia.

Tan sencillo como eso.

Pero claro que Venezuela no es Cuba. El virus del "bochinche" del que hablaba Francisco de Miranda, terminará explotándoles en la cara. Es el mismo virus que provoca la viveza criolla; el Caracas-Magallanes; la ganancia fácil y rápida; los carnavales; Semana Santa; la parrillita; las cervecitas; la inundación de centros comerciales cuando suben el dólar; la ropa de marca y de moda; el bonche; los viajes; el carro de lujo; las bailoterapias populares. Este virus del "bochinche", suele hacer su máxima aparición cuando es sometido.

La explosión de la crisis eléctrica; la de PDVSA que está por reventar y la insolvencia del pago de endeudamiento que se ve clarito venir, serán la espoleta que reviente la granada del "bochinche". Estas tres crisis cambiarán el curso de los acontecimientos. Pues la comida que llena las ollas de los comedores populares para entretener a los humildes; la beca que paga a las madres solteras del barrio y las otras migajas que inventan para cegar a los que menos tienen, se acabarán con la crisis. En ese momento, al pueblo se le saldrá el bochinche que lleva por dentro para transformarse en furia popular.

Nota: Esta columna ha sido escrita después de un round de reflexiones con varios exilados no sólo de éste Gobierno, sino de quienes tuvieron que abandonar el país por la dictadura perejimenizta.



--